<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cheshire SEO &#187; Statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheshire-seo.co.uk/category/statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheshire-seo.co.uk</link>
	<description>Mumbeling and Musings through the world of SEO Consultancey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:18:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Average click through rates &#8211; Lies Damn Lies and Statistics</title>
		<link>http://www.cheshire-seo.co.uk/average-click-through-rates-lies-damn-lies-and-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cheshire-seo.co.uk/average-click-through-rates-lies-damn-lies-and-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheshire-seo.co.uk/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of us may remember  a number of years back now that AOL released a whole pile of use age data for analysis and  general consumption, some bright sparks worked out it could be used to determine the average click through rates based on the position of your website in the SERPS for any particular [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of us may remember  a number of years back now tha<strong>t AOL</strong> released a whole pile of <strong>use age dat</strong>a for analysis and  general consumption, some bright sparks worked out it could be used to determine the <strong>average click through rates based on the position of your website</strong> in the SERPS for any particular term.</p>
<p>The figure that was banded about was around<strong> 40% for position on</strong>e dropping to<strong> 20% for two</strong> and further from that. However after looking at the stats it is obvious that  a mistake was made the percentages we calculated by comparing the positions clicks, to the total number of clicks. However this gives average percentage of clicks not searches and this was in error. Because what we all want to know if we get  50,000 searches for this term how much traffic do I think I should be getting.</p>
<p>Remember only 70% of searches click on a natural listing , 30 % click on paid positions, also many users don&#8217;t click at all and refine there search or wander off and eat their tea instead.  Taking this into consideration the averages are much smaller with only about 22.6 % of searches becoming a click on the first listing. As far as I can make out the figures should of looked like this.</p>
<div align='center'>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="145"><strong> Position </strong></td>
<td width="163"><strong> Clicks </strong></td>
<td width="96"><strong> Average CTR </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">1</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">8,220,278.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">22.60%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">2</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">2,316,738.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">6.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">3</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">1,640,751.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">4.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">4</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">1,171,642.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">3.22%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">5</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">943,667.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">2.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">6</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">774,718.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">2.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">7</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">655,914.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">1.80%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">8</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">579,206.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">1.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">9</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">549,196.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">1.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">10</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">577,325.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">1.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">11</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">127,688.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">0.35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">12</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">108,555.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">0.30%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">13</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">101,802.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">0.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">14</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">94,221.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">0.26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">15</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">91,020.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">0.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">16</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">75,006.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">0.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">17</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">70,054.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">0.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">18</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">65,832.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">0.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">19</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">62,141.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">0.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">20</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">58,384.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">0.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom"></td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom"></td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom">No Natural click</td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom">16,946,938.00</td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom">46.60%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="145" valign="bottom"><strong>Total searches</strong></td>
<td width="163" valign="bottom"><strong>36,369,567.00</strong></td>
<td width="96" valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.cheshire-seo.co.uk/why-has-my-page-rank-dropped/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Why has my page rank dropped?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cheshire-seo.co.uk/seo-pro-london-seminar-%e2%80%93highpoint-and-lowpoints/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">SEO Pro London Seminar – High points and Low points</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cheshire-seo.co.uk/5-things-to-avoid-when-hiring-an-seo-company/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">5 Things To Avoid When Hiring An SEO Company</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cheshire-seo.co.uk/why-seo-consultants-need-to-be-strategic/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Why SEO Consultants Need To Be Strategic</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cheshire-seo.co.uk/5-tips-to-finding-a-good-seo-company/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">5 Tips To Finding A Good SEO Company</a></li><li>Powered by <a href="http://ajaydsouza.com/wordpress/plugins/contextual-related-posts/">Contextual Related Posts</a></li></ul></div><hr />

<b>Jon Hunter</b> is an SEO Consultant who has been working with the internet for 10 years and has been working as an SEO operative for the past 5.

<hr />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cheshire-seo.co.uk/average-click-through-rates-lies-damn-lies-and-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

